Responsibility of the Inspectorate for the Prevention and Handling of Corruption Cases in the Region or Ministry: (Reviewed in accordance with Law Number 19 of 2019 concerning the Eradication of Corruption)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61194/law.v2i1.107Keywords:
Inspectorate, Corruption, EradicationAbstract
This research aims to determine the role of the Inspectorate in carrying out internal oversight as an effort to detect potential corruption at the regional level. Rampant corruption at various levels of local government necessitates an active role from internal oversight institutions such as the Inspectorate. The Inspectorate serves as the frontline in preventing corruption at the local level. Consistent and effective anti-corruption efforts by the Inspectorate can positively contribute to creating a government that is clean, accountable, and serves with integrity for the welfare of the community. The role of the Inspectorate in preventing corruption at the local level is crucial in ensuring the establishment of a clean, transparent, and integrity-driven governance. As an internal oversight institution at the local level, the Inspectorate plays several strategic roles that contribute to anti-corruption efforts. This research aims to analyze the methods and strategies employed by the Inspectorate in monitoring and identifying potential corrupt practices, as well as to analyze the impact of internal oversight effectiveness on corruption prevention at the regional level. The research methodology involves documentation analysis, interviews with Inspectorate officials, and surveys of opinions from relevant stakeholders. The results of this research are expected to provide a better understanding of the Inspectorate's role in combating corruption at the local level and offer recommendations for improvements in internal oversight implementation.
References
Alfaruqi, M. U., & Purwatiningsih. (2013). Analisis Fungsi Pengawasan Dan Peran Inspektorat Jenderal Dalam Penerapan Good Public Governance (Studi Kasus: Kementerian Pertanian). Retrieved from http://www.ksap.org/sap/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/SAP2_Kajian-Akuntansi-HewanTernak.pdf
Anwar, Saiful. 2004. Sendi-Sendi Hukum Administrasi Negara, Jakarta: Glora Madani Press.
Engkus, Hoerudin, C. W., & Maolani, D. Y. (2019). Supervision and Control of The Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus in The Implementation of Regional Autonomy. International Journal of Science and Society, 1(1), 56–69.
Engkus et al (2020). Bureaucratic Corruptive Behavior: Causes And Motivation qaaof State Civil Aparatures in Indonesia. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(4), 5290– 5303. https://doi.org/10.37200/ijpr/v24i4/pr201627
Hari Sasangka dan Lily Rosita, Hukum Pembuktian Dalam Perkara Pidana, Mandar Maju,Bandung, 2003
Hidjaz, Kamal. Efektivitas Penyelenggaraan Kewenangan Dalam Sistem Pemerintahan Daerah Di Indonesia. Makasar: Pustaka Refleksi.
Jan Remmelink, Hukum Pidana (Komentar atas Pasal-Pasal Terpenting dari Kitab Undang Undang Hukum Pidana Belanda dan Padanannya dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Pidana Indonesia), Jakarta, Gramedia Pustaka. 2003
Kelsen, Hans. 2006. Teori Umum Tentang Hukum dan Negara (diterjemahkan oleh Raisul Muttaqien dari Hans Kelsen, 1971, General Theory of Law and State, Russel and Russel, New York). Bandung: Nusamedia dan Nuansa.
Martiman Prodjohamidjojo, komentar atas KUHAP: Kitab Undang – undang Hukum Acara Pidana, Pradaya Paramitha, Jakarta, 1984.
Muchsan. 1992. Sistem Pengawasan Terhadap Perbuatan Aparat Pemerintah dan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Mudhofir, Ali. 1996. Kamus Teori dan Aliran dalam Filsafat dan Teologi. Yogyakarta: Gajahmada University Press.
Muhammad, Abdulkadir. 2004. Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Munir Fuady, SH., M.H., LL.M., Teori Hukum Pembuktian Pidana dan Perdata, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2012
Rachmawan, F., Alamsyah, Z., Laksana, R. H. C., & Probohudono, A. N. (2020). Usulan Penggabungan BPKP, Itjen, dan Bawasda untuk Mewujudkan Tata Kelola Pemerintahan Dalam Rangka Mengurangi Praktik Korupsi di Indonesia. 1–21. Retrieved from http://lib.ibs.ac.id/materi/Prosiding/SNA XVIII/makalah/110.pdf
Ridwan, Juniarso dan Achmad Sodik Sudrajat. 2012. Hukum Administrasi Negara dan Kebijakan Pelayanan Publik. Jakarta: Nuansa.
Semma, Mansyur. 2008. Negara dan Korupsi Pemikiran Mochtar Lubis atas Negara, Manusia Indonesia, dan perilaku politik. Jakarta: Buku Obor.
Siwy, M. I., Saerang, D. P. E., & Karamoy, H. (2016). Pelaksanaan Fungsi Aparat Pengawas Intern Pemerintah (Apip) Untuk Menunjang Tingkat Kewajaran Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Kota Manado. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952., 5–24.
Soekanto, Soerjono. 1986, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum (Cetakan Ketiga). Jakarta: UI-PRESS.
Tim Penulis Buku Pendidikan Anti Korupsi. 2011. Pendidikan Anti Korupsi untuk Perguruan Tinggi/Anti Korupsi. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
Law Number 19 of 2019 concerning the Eradication of Corruption
Minister of Home Affairs Regulation (Permendagri) Number 35 of 2018 concerning the Policy of Supervising the Implementation of Regional Governance in 2019
Minister of State Apparatus Empowerment Regulation (Permenpan) Number 9 of 2009
Minister of Home Affairs Regulation (Permendagri) Number 64 of 2007
