Solution for Recording Interfaith Marriages Following Supreme Court Circular (SEMA) Number 2 of 2023 in Indonesia

Authors

  • Syafrida Universitas Tama
  • Arihta Esther Tarigan Universitas Tama
  • Reni Suryani Universitas Pamulang
  • Warsito Universitas Ibnu Chaldun

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61194/law.v2i2.158

Keywords:

Registration, Interfaith Marriage

Abstract

This research aims to explore the solutions for recording marriages following the issuance of Supreme Court Circular (SEMA) Number 2 of 2023. According to the law, a marriage is valid if it meets the cumulative elements of Article 2, paragraphs (1) and (2), which require that it be in accordance with religious and belief systems and recorded according to regulations. Conversely, a marriage is invalid if it does not comply with religious and belief laws, resulting in the inability to register it. Before the issuance of the SEMA, interfaith marriages could be registered at the Civil Registry Office by submitting a registration application to the local District Court. However, after the issuance of this circular, such registration is no longer possible. The research method adopts a normative juridical approach, delving into literature data, particularly legislation. Despite the new regulations, interfaith marriage registrations can still occur, as judges may base their decisions on the Population Administration Law rather than the Marriage Law. Article 56, paragraph (1) of the Marriage Law essentially requires Indonesian citizens to comply with the marriage law, leaving no room for interfaith marriages. Therefore, to prevent registrations by judges at all court levels, it is necessary to reconstruct the Population Administration Law and require that one of the parties adheres to the religion and/or beliefs of their partner.

References

Andayani, D. (2022, March 9). detiknews. Retrieved May 24, 2024, from Viral Pernikahan Beda Agama di Semarang, Wamenag: Tidak Tercatat di KUA: https://news.detik.com/berita/d-5975172/viral-pernikahan-beda-agama-di-semarang-wamenag-tidak-tercatat-di-kua

Anwar, A. S. (2020). Penanganna Coronavirus (Covid 19) Ditinjau dari Perspektif Kesehatan Masyarakat. Yogyakarta: Gosyen Publishing.

Aulawi, A. S. (1981). Hukum Perkawinan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Bintang Bulan.

Bachtiar. (2018). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Tanggerang Selatan: Unpam Press.

Bachtiar. (2020). Pembebanan Tanggungjawab Perdata Kepada Pemerintah Kepala Daerah Akibat Wanprestasi oleh Kepala Dinas Kajian Putusan Nomor 72/PDT.G/2014/PN.TNG. Komisi Yudisial.

Dahwal, S. (2016). Hukum Perkawinan Beda Agama Dalam Teori dan Praktiknya di Indonesia. Bandung: CV. Mandar Maju.

Febriani, G. A. (2022, March 9). Wolipop. Retrieved May 24, 2024, from Viral Nikah Beda Agama ke 1.424 di Semarang, Pengantin Wanita Pakai Hijab: https://wolipop.detik.com/wedding-news/d-5974675/viral-nikah-beda-agama-ke-1-424-di-semarang-pengantin-wanita-pakai-hij

Hadikusuma, H. (1990). Hukum Perkawinan Indonesia. Bandung: CV. Mandar Maju.

Hadjon, P. M. (1987). Perlindungan Bagi Rakyat di Indonesia. Surabaya: PT. Bina Ilmu.

Ichtiyanto. (2003). Perkawinan Campuran dalam Negara Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: Badan Litbang Departemen Agama Republik Indonesia.

Kementrian Agama RI Direktorat Jenderal Bimbingan Masyarakat Islam Direktorat Bina KUA dan Keluarga Sakinah. (2018). Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI) di Indonesia, Jakarta: Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia.

Kristanti, E. S. (2010). Status Hukum Perkawinan Konghucu Menurut UU No 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro.

Liha. (2023, November 4). mui.or.id. Retrieved May 24, 2024, from Perkawinan Beda Agama: https://mui.or.id/baca/fatwa/perkawinan-beda-agamab/fra. (2023, August 31). CNN Indonesia. Retrieved May 24, 2024, from MA Turunkan Tim Periksa Putusan PN Jakut soal Pernikahan Beda Agama: https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20230830161919-12-992486/ma-turunkan-tim-periksa-putusan-pn-jakut-soal-pernikahan-beda-agama

Marzuki, P. M. (2014). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group.

Muhammad, A. (2010). Hukum Perusahaan Indonesia. Jakarta: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Muhsinin, Mahmud, (2019). Melayu dan Islam Dalam Perspektif Sejarah, Al-Hikmah: Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama, Vol. 5(2).

Nugraha. (2020). Kearifan Lokal Dalam Menghadapi Pandemi Covid-19: Sebuah Kajian Literatur. Sosietas, 10(1), 745-753.

Riris Andono, C. I. (2020). Buku Teks Epidemiologi Untuk Kesehatan Masyarakat. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gajahmada Press.

Salim & Septiana, Erlies, (2022). Penerapan Teori Hukum pada Tesis dan Disertasi. Depok: Rajawali Pers.

Soekanto, S. (2013). Penerapan Teori Hukum pada Penelitian Tesis dan Disertasi. Depok: PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Sulistiani, S. L. (2015). Kedudukan Hukum Anak Perkawinan Beda Agama Menurut Hukum Posistif dan Hukum Islam. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Teresia, L. U. (2017). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Legalitas Volume 10 Nomor, 115.

Tobing, L. (2017, September 20). hukum.online. Retrieved May 24, 2024, from Masalah Pencatatan Perkawinan Beda Agama: https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/masalah-pencatatan-perkawinan-beda-agama-lt528d75a6252d7/

Legislative Regulations:

Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage

Law Number 1 of 1974 as amended by Law Number 16 of 2019 concerning Amendments to Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage

Law Number 23 of 2006 concerning Population Administration

Presidential Instruction of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 1991 concerning the Dissemination of the Compilation of Islamic Law

Supreme Court Circular Number 2 of 2023 regarding the Prohibition of Registration of Interfaith Marriages for Judges at Various Levels of Courts.

Website:

http://www.kaj.or,id/dokumen/kursus-persiapan-perkawinan-2/hukum-gereja-mengenai-pernika-han-katolik

Downloads

Published

2024-05-28

Issue

Section

Articles