The Study of the Indonesian Ulama Council's (MUI) Fatwa Number 11 of 2012 Regarding the Status of Children Born out of Adultery and Their Treatment: Correlation with the Constitutional Court Decision Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010

Authors

  • Asih Susilowati Universitas Pamulang

Keywords:

MUI, Child Protection, Historical-Sociological Analysis

Abstract

The status of children born out of wedlock and the treatment towards them: a study of the fatwa from the Indonesian Ulama Council (Majelis Ulama Indonesia or MUI) Number 11 of 2012 concerning the position of children born out of wedlock and its correlation with the Constitutional Court Decision Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010, a historical-sociological analysis. In reality, pregnancies outside of marriage are still prevalent in Indonesian society. Legal provisions also address marriage issues and the status of children, as stipulated in Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage, which, in Article 1, defines marriage as a spiritual and physical bond between a man and a woman. Regarding the status of children born out of wedlock and the treatment towards them, MUI issues a fatwa that emphasizes legal protection for the child. The government is obligated to protect children born out of wedlock and prevent abandonment, especially by imposing punishment on the man responsible for the birth to fulfill the child's needs. However, this does not establish paternity for the man causing the birth. The correlation with the Constitutional Court decision and the historical-sociological analysis addresses the societal need for fair rights and protection, particularly for women and children. Despite this, these considerations were not incorporated into the revision of Law Number 16 of 2019 concerning Marriage. This raises questions about the fulfillment of philosophical and sociological considerations in the formation of the Republic of Indonesia Law Number 16 of 2019 amending Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage.

References

Berrick, J., Dickens, J., Pösö, T., & Skivenes, M. (2020). Are child protection workers and judges in alignment with citizens when considering interventions into a family? A cross-country study of four jurisdictions. Children and Youth Services Review, 108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104562

Broadley, K., & Goddard, C. (2014). A public health approach to child protection: Why data matter. Children Australia, 40(1), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/cha.2014.37

Hartill, M., & Lang, M. (2018). Reports of child protection and safeguarding concerns in sport and leisure settings: an analysis of English local authority data between 2010 and 2015. Leisure Studies, 37(5), 479–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2018.1497076

Kasim, F. M., Nurdin, A., Muthalib, S. A., Syarifuddin, S., & Samad, M. (2022). The Protection of Women and Children Post-Divorce in Sharia Courts in Aceh: A Sociological Perspective. Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 22(2), 411–432. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v22i2.28747

Kirk, G., & Duschinsky, R. (2017). On the margins of the child protection system: creating space for relational social work practice. Child and Family Social Work, 22(2), 963–971. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12316

Lacerna, R. A. A., & Ancheta, J. R. (2020). State of communicating children protection in Taguig City, Philippines: Basis for a sustainable development plan. Youth Voice Journal, 10, 1–30. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85089426508&partnerID=40&md5=c841177276a81033d948a113f238a34e

Meiksans, J., McDougall, S., Arney, F., Flaherty, R., Chong, A., Ward, F., & Taylor, C. (2021). The nature of domestic and family violence reported to child protection prenatally. Children and Youth Services Review, 120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105685

Moonga, F., & Green, S. (2016). Risks and vulnerabilities of children in Zambia: Mooting responsive social protection interventions. Social Work (South Africa), 52(3), 350–369. https://doi.org/10.15270/52-2-514

Nietz, H. (2019). Informing Social Work Practice with Theory: Reflections on the Protection of Aboriginal Children in Remote Communities of Australia. British Journal of Social Work, 49(8), 2021–2041. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcy124

Pandey, A. K., & Gautam, A. (2015). Quality of Education, Child Labour and Child Protection Structure: Interrogating the Status of Child Rights in Uttar Pradesh. Social Change, 45(1), 24–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049085714561835

Porter, C., & Goyal, R. (2016). Social protection for all ages? Impacts of Ethiopia’s Productive Safety Net Program on child nutrition. Social Science and Medicine, 159, 92–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.05.001

Thørnblad, R., & Holtan, A. (2013). Kinship Foster Children: Actors in their encounter with the Child Protection System. Qualitative Social Work, 12(3), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325011428187

Abdurrahman, “Kompilasi Hukum Islam di Indonesia”, Akademika Pressindo, Jakarta, 1992.

Amri, Aulil, & Khalidi, Muhidi. (2021). Efektivitas Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 Terhadap Pernikahan Di Bawah Umur. Jurnal Justisia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Perundang-Undangan Dan Pranata Sosial, 6(1), 85. Https://Doi.Org/10.22373/Justisia.V6i1.10613

Basyir, Ahmad Azhar, “Hukum Perkawinan Islam”, UUI Press, Yogyakarta, 2000.

Ensiklopedia Hadits – Kitab 9 Imam, Salnatera, 2016

Fadil SJ, Salim, Nor, Pembaharuan Hukum Keluarga di Indonesia Telaah Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi, Malang: UIN Malik Press, 2013

Ghozali, Abdul Rahman, “Fikih Munakahat”, Prenada Media Group, Jakarta, 2018.

Hernoko, Agus Yudha, “Hukum Perjanjian Asas Proporsionalitas dalam Kontrak Komersial”, Laksbang Mediatama, Jogyakarta, 2008.

Muhibbin, Moch., Implikasi Hukum Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terhadap Perlindungan Hak Perempuan Dan Anak, Yudisia: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Dan Hukum Islam, Volume 13, Nomor 2, Desember 2022

Prawirohamidjojo, R. Soetojo, Hukum Waris Kodifikasi, Airlangga University Press, Surabaya, 2008

Prodjohamijo, Martiman, Hukum Perkawinan Indonesia, Penerbit Indonesia Legal Center Publishing, Jakarta, 2007 .

Ramulyo, Moch. Idris, Hukum Perkawinan, Hukum Kewarisan, Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama dan Zakat Menurut Hukum Islam, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2000.

Rofiq, Ahmad, “Hukum Islam di Indonesia”, PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2013.

Rokhmadi, Status Anak Di Luar Perkawinan Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 46/Puu -Viii/2010, Sawwa – Volume 11, Nomor 1, Oktober 2015

Soemiyati, Hukum Perkawinan Islam dan Undang-Undang Perkawinan, Cet IV, Yogyakarta: Liberty, 1999.

Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Bandung, Alfabeta , 2016

Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia of 1945

Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 16 of 2019 concerning Amendments to Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 24 of 2003 concerning the Constitutional Court

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 35 of 2014 concerning Child Protection

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights

Judicial Decision Constitutional Court Decision Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010

http://www.ibnukatsironline.com/2015/09/tafsir-surat-al-ahzab-ayat-4-5.html

https://news.detik.com/berita/d-1866192/mui-nilai-keputusan-mk-soal-status-anak-di-luar-nikah-overdosis

https://tafsirq.com/4-an-nisa/ayat-24

https://www.new.pa-mojokerto.go.id/surve-kepuasan/263-penetapan-asal-usul-anak-dan-akibat-hukumnya-dalam-hukum-positif

Downloads

Published

2024-01-09