The Politics of Asylum: Evaluating Non-Refoulement and Protection Systems for At-Risk Populations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61194/law.v3i1.721Keywords:
Non-Refoulement, Refugee Protection, Vulnerable Groups, Asylum Policy, Human Rights, Migration Governance, Comparative Refugee LawAbstract
This study explores the complex dynamics surrounding the implementation of non-refoulement and the protection of vulnerable refugee groups. The objective is to synthesize normative and empirical findings to examine systemic challenges and identify strategies for improvement. Using a narrative review approach, the study analyzes multidisciplinary literature across legal, political, and humanitarian domains to uncover patterns in refugee policy and practice. The review finds that despite widespread recognition of non-refoulement as a fundamental principle, implementation gaps persist due to bureaucratic inefficiencies, national security-driven policies, and political rhetoric. Vulnerable groups—such as women, children, and LGBTQ+ individuals—face systemic discrimination and reduced access to justice and social services. Comparative international analysis highlights disparities in protection standards between developed and developing nations, particularly in legal capacity and resource deployment. Solutions proposed in the literature include adopting intersectional approaches, establishing transparent asylum procedures, enhancing institutional coordination, and deploying digital systems to monitor claim evaluations. The study concludes that policy reform must prioritize inclusive frameworks grounded in human rights, with tailored protections for marginalized populations. Further research is needed to assess the impact of these strategies and address implementation constraints. These insights are critical to building responsive and equitable refugee protection systems that uphold international legal standards.
References
Ancite-Jepifánova, A. (2024). Beyond the “hybrid attack” paradigm: eu-belarus border crisis and the erosion of asylum-seeker rights in latvia, lithuania and poland. Avant the Journal of the Philosophical-Interdisciplinary Vanguard, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.26913/ava2202405 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26913/ava2202405
Appleby, J. (2024). The united states, europe, and the global compacts: honoring the right to remain and the right to migrate. Journal on Migration and Human Security, 13(1), 151-167. https://doi.org/10.1177/23315024241306416 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23315024241306416
Aras, N., Kabadayi, S., Özeren, E., & Aydın, E. (2021). Right to health and access to health-care services for refugees in turkey. Journal of Services Marketing, 35(7), 962-976. https://doi.org/10.1108/jsm-06-2020-0256 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-06-2020-0256
Barboza, J. (2022). Between a rock and a hard place: a human rights assessment of the fate of excluded asylum-seekers and criminal refugees in australia. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 41(4), 725-745. https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdac024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdac024
Berlo, P. (2016). The protection of asylum seekers in australian-pacific offshore processing: the legal deficit of human rights in a nodal reality. Human Rights Law Review, ngw017. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngw017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngw017
Brittle, R. (2019). A hostile environment for children? the rights and best interests of the refugee child in the united kingdom’s asylum law. Human Rights Law Review, 19(4), 753-785. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngz028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngz028
Boer, T. and Zieck, M. (2020). The legal abyss of discretion in the resettlement of refugees. International Journal of Refugee Law, 32(1), 54-85. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eeaa005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eeaa005
Farahat, A. and Markard, N. (2016). Forced migration governance: in search of sovereignty. German Law Journal, 17(6), 923-948. https://doi.org/10.1017/s2071832200021532 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200021532
GammeltoftHansen, T. and Tan, N. (2017). The end of the deterrence paradigm? future directions for global refugee policy. Journal on Migration and Human Security, 5(1), 28-56. https://doi.org/10.1177/233150241700500103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/233150241700500103
Ghebrai, S. and Ballucci, D. (2022). The social construction of age and ‘best interests’ discourses: an intersectional analysis of canadian immigration and refugee policy for children. Journal of Refugee Studies, 35(3), 1143-1159. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feac039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feac039
Habersky, E., Hetaba-Sabry, A., & McNally, C. (2023). On idle possibilities and missed chances: refugee rights in egypt. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 42(3), 259-285. https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdad009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdad009
Harvey, C. (2014). Time for reform? refugees, asylum-seekers, and protection under international human rights law. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 34(1), 43-60. https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdu018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdu018
Heriyanto, D., Sefriani, S., & Fézer, T. (2023). No choice but welcoming refugees: the non-refoulement principle as customary international law in indonesia. Lentera Hukum, 10(1), 135. https://doi.org/10.19184/ejlh.v10i1.37920 DOI: https://doi.org/10.19184/ejlh.v10i1.37920
Hruschka, C. and Rohmann, T. (2021). Excluded by crisis management? legislative hyperactivity in post2015 germany. International Migration, 61(3), 12-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12926 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.12926
Imran, H. (2022). The plight of boat refugees to thailand. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718115-bja10081 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718115-bja10081
Kędziora, K. (2024). Refugees' right to health: a case study of poland's disparate migration policies. Bioethics, 39(1), 58-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13300 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13300
Kerwin, D. (2012). The faltering us refugee protection system: legal and policy responses to refugees, asylum-seekers, and others in need of protection. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 31(1), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdr019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdr019
Kerwin, D. (2015). The us refugee protection system on the 35th anniversary of the refugee act of 1980. Journal on Migration and Human Security, 3(2), 205-254. https://doi.org/10.1177/233150241500300204 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/233150241500300204
Kobelinsky, C. (2018). The “inner belief” of french asylum judges., 53-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94749-5_3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94749-5_3
Leboeuf, L., Brun, C., & Marchetti, S. (2024). Introduction. between protection and harm. negotiated vulnerabilities in asylum laws and bureaucracies., 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-69808-8_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-69808-8_1
Magner, T. (2016). Refugee, asylum, and related legislation in the us congress: 2013–2016. Journal on Migration and Human Security, 4(4), 166-189. https://doi.org/10.1177/233150241600400401 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/233150241600400401
McNeal, K. (2019). Confessions of an ambivalent country expert: queer refugeeism in the uk and the political economy of (im)mobility in and out of trinidad and tobago. Anthropological Theory, 19(1), 191-215. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499618812600 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499618812600
Mujuzi, J. (2020). Non-refoulement principle and its application to refugees and asylum seekers who have committed offences in africa. International Human Rights Law Review, 9(2), 213-251. https://doi.org/10.1163/22131035-00902004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/22131035-00902004
Nicolosi, S. (2015). Re-conceptualizing the right to seek and obtain asylum in international law. International Human Rights Law Review, 4(2), 303-332. https://doi.org/10.1163/22131035-00402005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/22131035-00402005
Obinna, D. (2023). Title 42 and the power to exclude: asylum seekers and the denial of entry into the united states. Politics & Policy, 51(4), 508-523. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12542 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12542
Petcharamesree, S. (2015). Asean and its approach to forced migration issues. The International Journal of Human Rights, 20(2), 173-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2015.1079021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2015.1079021
Putri, R., Putri, Y., Ernawati, N., Havez, M., & Sabatira, F. (2024). Balancing the principles of non-refoulment and national security in the protection of refugee rights: a legal and policy analysis of refugee handling in australia. Jurnal Ius Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 12(2), 372-392. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v12i2.1391 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v12i2.1391
Rumiartha, I. and Jayantiari, I. (2023). Fulfilling right to education for rohingya refugee children in indonesia. The Age of Human Rights Journal, (21), e7659. https://doi.org/10.17561/tahrj.v21.7659 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17561/tahrj.v21.7659
Sajjad, T. (2018). What’s in a name? ‘refugees’, ‘migrants’ and the politics of labelling. Race & Class, 60(2), 40-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306396818793582 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306396818793582
Samuels, H. (2017). Women asylum seekers in the current crisis: a conversation. Feminist Legal Studies, 25(1), 99-122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-017-9346-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-017-9346-z
Sousa, L. and Costa, P. (2018). The development of the asylum law and refugee protection regimes in portugal, 1975–2017. Refuge Canada S Journal on Refuge, 34(2), 28-37. https://doi.org/10.7202/1055574ar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1055574ar
Starkowski, K. (2022). The body at the borderlands: applying a feminist-of-colour disability studies lens to the usa-mexico refugee crisis. Feminist Encounters a Journal of Critical Studies in Culture and Politics, 6(2), 27. https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/12350 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20897/femenc/12350
Syahrin, M. (2021). The principle of non-refoulement as jus cogens: history, application, and exception in international refugee law. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 6(1), 53-82. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v6i1.43350 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v6i1.43350
Tsiganou, J., Chalkia, A., & Lempesi, M. (2021). Covid-19 crisis as the new-state-of-the-art in the crimmigration milieu. Social Sciences, 10(12), 457. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10120457 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10120457
Vanto, J., Saarikkomäki, E., AlvesaloKuusi, A., Lepinkäinen, N., Pirjatanniemi, E., & Lavapuro, J. (2021). Collectivized discretion: seeking explanations for decreased asylum recognition rates in finland after europe's 2015 “refugee crisis”. International Migration Review, 56(3), 754-779. https://doi.org/10.1177/01979183211044096 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01979183211044096
Young, S. (2024). In continuation of a ‘unified immigration agenda’: the end of asylum at the united states southwest border. International Journal of Refugee Law, 36(3), 282-317. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eeae033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eeae033
Zenginkuzucu, D. (2021). A comparative analysis on international refugee law and temporary protection in the context of turkey. The Age of Human Rights Journal, (17), 385-410. https://doi.org/10.17561/tahrj.v17.6297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17561/tahrj.v17.6297
