Rethinking Tax Systems for Sustainable Development Goals

Authors

  • Eneng Sugihyanty Universitas Dirgantara Marsekal Suryadarma
  • Safri Universitas Dirgantara Marsekal Suryadarma
  • Ahmad Faisal Universitas Dirgantara Marsekal Suryadarma

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61194/economics.v2i4.647

Keywords:

taxation, sustainable development goals, environmental tax, fiscal incentives, digital governance, tax reform, institutional quality

Abstract

Taxation plays a pivotal role in advancing sustainable development goals (SDGs), yet its implementation faces several systemic challenges. This narrative review aims to explore the effectiveness of tax policies in supporting SDGs through the lenses of environmental taxation, fiscal incentives, progressive tax reforms, and digital transformation. A qualitative review method was employed to synthesize findings from recent empirical and comparative studies, focusing on the interaction between taxation mechanisms and sustainability outcomes. The results highlight that environmental taxes effectively reduce carbon emissions and promote energy efficiency, while fiscal incentives drive investments in renewable energy by alleviating financial constraints. Progressive taxation contributes to income redistribution and social justice, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Furthermore, institutional quality and good governance are crucial in enhancing the success of fiscal strategies, with countries exhibiting stronger institutions achieving higher efficiency and compliance. The digitalization of tax systems, including AI-enabled tax education, further improves transparency and public trust. Despite these benefits, challenges such as tax system complexity, coordination failures, and data limitations hinder the optimal realization of taxation’s potential. Thus, the study recommends integrated policy reforms, enhanced public engagement, and further interdisciplinary research to strengthen tax systems as instruments for sustainable development. These insights provide a strategic foundation for policymakers aiming to align fiscal systems with the global SDG agenda.

References

Adegboye, A., Adegboye, K., Uwuigbe, U., Ojeka, S., & Fasanu, E. (2023). Taxation, democracy, and inequality in sub-saharan africa: relevant linkages for sustainable development goals. Politics & Policy, 51(4), 696-722. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12547

Ali, K., Du, J., Kırıkkaleli, D., Oláh, J., & Bakhsh, S. (2023). Do environmental taxes, environmental innovation, and energy resources matter for environmental sustainability: evidence of five sustainable economies. Heliyon, 9(11), e21577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21577

Alves, D. (2024). Elections, coalitions, and the politics of brazil's macroeconomic stabilization. Politics & Policy, 52(6), 1227-1245. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12637

Davydenko, N., Тітенко, З., Koval, V., & Буряк, А. (2023). Fiscal regulation policy and financial incentives impact on the environmental management. Iop Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, 1269(1), 012010. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1269/1/012010

Dianov, S., Королева, Л., Pokrovskaia, N., Victorova, N., & Zaytsev, A. (2022). The influence of taxation on income inequality: analysis of the practice in the eu countries. Sustainability, 14(15), 9066. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159066

Donnelly, K. (2023). Storing the future of energy: navigating energy storage policy to promote clean energy generation. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 42(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.14062

Dradra, Z. (2024). Do energy transition and environmental taxation contribute to sustainable development? evidence from oecd countries. Arab Gulf Journal of Scientific Research, 42(4), 1814-1831. https://doi.org/10.1108/agjsr-05-2023-0195

Etter‐Phoya, R., Manthalu, C., Kalizinje, F., Chigaru, F., Mazimbe, B., Phiri, A., … & O’Hare, B. (2023). Financing child rights in malawi. BMC Public Health, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16319-x

Foggia, G. and Beccarello, M. (2023). Sustainability pathways in european waste management for meeting circular economy goals. Environmental Research Letters, 18(12), 124001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad067f

Foggia, G., Beccarello, M., & Arrigo, U. (2023). Assessment of the european emissions trading system’s impact on sustainable development. Sustainability, 16(1), 223. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16010223

Gaspar, V. and Amaglobeli, D. (2020). Tax, climate change, and sustainable development: global problems, global solutions?., 211-226. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53265-9_15

Gomes, S., Jorge, S., & Eugénio, T. (2020). Teaching sustainable development in business sciences degrees: evidence from portugal. Sustainability Accounting Management and Policy Journal, 12(3), 611-634.https://doi.org/10.1108/sampj-10-2019-0365

Hangoma, P. and Surgey, G. (2019). Contradictions within the sdgs: are sin taxes for health improvement at odds with employment and economic growth in zambia. Globalization and Health, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-019-0510-x

Ivanov, I. (2020). Taxation for gender equality: proposal of measures for the republic of serbia on the road to european integration. Pravni Zapisi, 11(1), 204-228. https://doi.org/10.5937/pravzap0-26172

Kotlán, I., Němec, D., Kotlánová, E., Skalka, P., Macek, R., & Machová, Z. (2021). European green deal: environmental taxation and its sustainability in conditions of high levels of corruption. Sustainability, 13(4), 1981. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041981

Kumar, R. and Stauvermann, P. (2024). Environmental injustice: the effects of environmental taxes on income distribution in an oligopolistic general equilibrium model. Sustainability, 16(10), 4142. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16104142

Maarof, M., Ahmed, D., & Samour, A. (2023). Fiscal policy, oil price, foreign direct investment, and renewable energy—a path to sustainable development in south africa. Sustainability, 15(12), 9500. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129500

Mateko, F. (2024). Opportunities in emerging technologies for southern africa: how the global south should adopt to take advantage?. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 90(5). https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12321

Mishchenko, A., Dalkıran, A., Novakovska, І., Skrypnyk, L., & Іщенко, Н. (2022). Environmentally sustainable airport development: ukrainian case of decarbonization. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, 95(3), 488-500. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeat-06-2022-0154

Moosavian, S., Borzuei, D., Zahedi, R., & Ahmadi, A. (2022). Evaluation of research and development subsidies and fossil energy tax for sustainable development using computable general equilibrium model. Energy Science & Engineering, 10(9), 3267-3280. https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.1217

Nchofoung, T., Fotio, H., & Miamo, C. (2023). Green taxation and renewable energy technologies adoption: a global evidence. Renewable Energy Focus, 44, 334-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ref.2023.01.010

Ng, K. (2024). Sustainable sides of taxation: an international law approach. Environmental Law Review, 26(1), 33-52. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614529241235384

Omodero, C. (2022). The effects of corporate and individual income taxes on a gricultural development in nigeria. Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, 22(2), 168-179. https://doi.org/10.2478/foli-2022-0024

Saba, C. and Monkam, N. (2024). Leveraging the potential of artificial intelligence (ai) in exploring the interplay among tax revenue, institutional quality, and economic growth in the g-7 countries. Ai & Society, 40(2), 653-675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-01885-4

Saudi, N., Reviane, I., Paddu, A., Agustin, G., Djam’an, F., & Sabbar, S. (2024). Carbon neutrality and sustainable development: an empirical study of indonesia’s renewable energy adoption. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 14(4), 526-537. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.15953

Saqib, N., Usman, M., Rădulescu, M., Șerbu, R., Kamal, M., & Belașcu, L. (2023). Synergizing green energy, natural resources, global integration, and environmental taxation: pioneering a sustainable development goal framework for carbon neutrality targets. Energy & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305x231215319

Savoia, A., Sen, K., & Tagem, A. (2023). Constraints on the executive and tax revenues in the long run. Journal of Institutional Economics, 19(3), 314-331. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1744137422000492

Usman, M., Malik, A., Nabi, H., Masood, M., Mujtaba, M., Fouad, Y., … & Qazi, A. (2024). Carbon taxation on high utility transport fuels: an implementation of enviro-economic analysis for the sustainable environment. Heliyon, 10(13), e33786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33786

Wong, K., Chuah, J., & Hope, C. (2018). As an emerging economy, should malaysia adopt carbon taxation?. Energy & Environment, 30(1), 91-108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305x18787273

Youssef, A. and Dahmani, M. (2024). Assessing the impact of digitalization, tax revenues, and energy resource capacity on environmental quality: fresh evidence from cs-ardl in the ekc framework. Sustainability, 16(2), 474. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020474

Downloads

Published

2024-11-30