Toward Sustainable Cost Accounting: Drivers, Barriers, and Institutional Dynamics

Authors

  • Fifi Nurafifah Ibrahim Universitas Muslim Indonesia
  • Damith Gangodawilage Qasim Ibrahim School of Business

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61194/ijat.v2i4.716

Keywords:

Sustainable Cost Accounting, Digital Transformation, Environmental Cost Internalization, Regulatory Frameworks, Institutional Dynamics, Reporting Transparency, Stakeholder Accountability

Abstract

This narrative review explores the evolving landscape of sustainable cost accounting by analyzing key economic, socio-cultural, and regulatory drivers that shape its adoption. The study aims to synthesize empirical findings and theoretical insights to understand the systemic enablers and barriers influencing transformation efforts. Methodologically, the review follows a thematic synthesis of peer-reviewed literature, examining how innovations in technology, institutional frameworks, and organizational dynamics interact with sustainability objectives. Findings reveal that integrating environmental and social externalities into cost accounting enhances operational efficiency, financial transparency, and stakeholder trust. Digital tools such as cloud analytics and real-time reporting are identified as enablers that reduce operational costs and improve decision-making accuracy. However, conceptual fragmentation, resistance to change, and lack of methodological standardization hinder widespread implementation. The discussion underscores the role of regulatory institutions, global reporting standards, and stakeholder expectations in facilitating systemic transformation. Investment in digital infrastructure and cross-sectoral partnerships is recommended to overcome institutional inertia and scale implementation. Moreover, emerging evidence supports the need for integrated reporting models and predictive technologies to measure long-term sustainability impacts. In conclusion, transitioning to sustainable cost accounting requires a multidimensional approach, combining technological innovation, institutional support, and cultural adaptation. This review provides a foundation for future research and policy aimed at achieving transparent, accountable, and sustainability-driven cost accounting practices.

References

Abhishek, N., Suraj, N., Rahiman, H., Nawaz, N., Kodikal, R., Kulal, A., & Raj, K. (2024). Digital transformation in accounting: elevating effectiveness across accounting, auditing, reporting and regulatory compliance. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change. https://doi.org/10.1108/jaoc-01-2024-0039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-01-2024-0039

Alawattage, C., & Alsaid, L. (2018). Accounting and structural reforms: a case study of egyptian electricity. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 50, 15–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2017.09.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2017.09.001

Bhimani, A. (2015). Management accounting. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 466–470). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.73013-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.73013-3

Casey, G., Fried, S., & Gibson, M. (2024). Understanding climate damages: consumption versus investment. European Economic Review, 167, 104799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2024.104799 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2024.104799

Gourfinkel, D. (2021). The main challenges of public sector accounting reforms and world bank’s public sector accounting and reporting (pulsar) program. Journal of Public Budgeting Accounting & Financial Management, 34(2), 347–352. https://doi.org/10.1108/jpbafm-05-2021-0079 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-05-2021-0079

Harun, H., Van-Peursem, K., & Eggleton, I. (2015). Indonesian public sector accounting reforms: dialogic aspirations a step too far? Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(5), 706–738. https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-12-2012-1182 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-12-2012-1182

Humphrey, C., & Miller, P. (2012). Rethinking impact and redefining responsibility. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, 25(2), 295–327. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513571211198773 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513571211198773

Irvine, H., & Moerman, L. (2017). Gambling with the public sphere: accounting’s contribution to debate on social issues. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 48, 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2017.05.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2017.05.002

Kamaruddin, M., & Auzair, S. (2022). The impact of financial management practices on accountability of islamic social enterprise (ise. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 16(4), 669–686. https://doi.org/10.1108/imefm-05-2021-0184 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-05-2021-0184

Landi, S., Costantini, A., Fasan, M., & Bonazzi, M. (2021). Public engagement and dialogic accounting through social media during covid-19 crisis: a missed opportunity? Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, 35(1), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-08-2020-4884 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-08-2020-4884

Liberato, M., Paiva, I., & Serrasqueiro, R. (2023). Constraints and stimuli in the implementation of public accounting reform: systematic literature review and future research agenda. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 20(3), 560–592. https://doi.org/10.1108/jaoc-01-2022-0018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-01-2022-0018

Malega, P., Chovancová, J., & Majerník, M. (2024). Environmental cost accounting of material flows during their technological transformation. Ecological Engineering & Environmental Technology, 25(5), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.12912/27197050/184077 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12912/27197050/184077

Narayan, A., & Stittle, J. (2018). The role of accounting in transforming public tertiary institutions in New Zealand. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, 31(2), 503–530. https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-09-2016-2722 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-09-2016-2722

Pantea, M., Cilan, T., Cuc, L., Rad, D., Bâtcă‐Dumitru, C., Șendroiu, C., & Gomoi, B. (2024). Optimizing Romanian managerial accounting practices through digital technologies: a resource-based and technology-deterministic approach to sustainable accounting. Electronics, 13(16), 3206. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13163206 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13163206

Pärl, Ü., Paemurru, E., Paemurru, K., & Kivisoo, H. (2020). Dialogical turn of accounting and accountability integrated reporting in non-profit and public-sector organisations. Journal of Public Budgeting Accounting & Financial Management, 34(1), 27–51. https://doi.org/10.1108/jpbafm-11-2019-0178 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-11-2019-0178

Peng, B., Li, Y., Yang, C., Feng, H., & Gong, X. (2024). Augmented pre-training-based carbon emission accounting method using electricity data under small-sample condition. Frontiers in Energy Research, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2024.1505098 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2024.1505098

Saraite-Sariene, L., Alonso-Cañadas, J., Galán-Valdivieso, F., & Pérez, M. (2019). Non-financial information versus financial as a key to the stakeholder engagement: a higher education perspective. Sustainability, 12(1), 331. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010331 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010331

Slama, F., & Jandoubi, M. (2024). Ipsas adoption, public governance and corruption perception in mena and sub-saharan africa countries. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting. https://doi.org/10.1108/jfra-12-2023-0773 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-12-2023-0773

Tran, T., & Herzig, C. (2020). Material flow cost accounting in developing countries: a systematic review. Sustainability, 12(13), 5413. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135413 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135413

Gemmill, H. B. , B. L. , & D. P. (2021). True cost accounting for food. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003050803 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003050803

Twyford, E. (2022). Crisis accountability and aged “care” during covid-19. Meditari Accountancy Research, 31(1), 27–51. https://doi.org/10.1108/medar-05-2021-1296 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-05-2021-1296

Twyford, E., & Abbas, R. (2022). Broadening the boundaries of accounting: a call for interdisciplinarity in the calculative era. Meditari Accountancy Research, 31(1), 187–211. https://doi.org/10.1108/medar-06-2021-1338 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-06-2021-1338

Vărzaru, A. (2022). Assessing digital transformation of cost accounting tools in healthcare. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(23), 15572. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315572 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315572

Vărzaru, A., Bocean, C., Criveanu, M., Budică‐Iacob, A., & Popescu, D. (2023). Assessing the contribution of managerial accounting in sustainable organizational development in the healthcare industry. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(4), 2895. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20042895 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20042895

Vollmer, H., Helden, J., & Steccolini, I. (2024). New development: keeping up with accounting in society—public sector challenges. Public Money & Management, 44(8), 733–736. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2024.2364451 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2024.2364451

Wang, N., Zhao, Y., Li, J., & Cai, G. (2024). Enhancing China’s green GDP accounting through blockchain and artificial neural networks (ANNs) and machine learning (ML) modeling. Scientific Reports, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-75994-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-75994-x

Zhang, Y., Pan, C., & Liao, H. (2021). Carbon neutrality policies and technologies: a scientometric analysis of social science disciplines. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.761736 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.761736

Downloads

Published

2024-11-30

How to Cite

Ibrahim, F. N., & Gangodawilage, D. (2024). Toward Sustainable Cost Accounting: Drivers, Barriers, and Institutional Dynamics . Sinergi International Journal of Accounting and Taxation, 2(4), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.61194/ijat.v2i4.716