Discretionary Accruals under Positive Accounting Theory: The Role of Sustainability Disclosure and Ownership Governance in Indonesian Basic and Chemical Industry Firms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61194/ijat.v4i2.1006Keywords:
discretionary accruals, institutional ownership, managerial ownership, positive accounting theory, sustainability disclosureAbstract
This study examines signed discretionary accruals as accounting choice behavior within the Positive Accounting Theory (PAT) framework in Indonesian basic and chemical industry firms. Using balanced panel data from 58 firms during 2021–2024 (232 firm-year observations), discretionary accruals are measured using the Modified Jones Model, while the analysis employs a cross-section fixed effects model selected through Chow and Hausman tests. The findings provide partial and conditional support for PAT. Profitability shows a weak negative association with signed discretionary accruals, indicating limited support for the bonus-plan hypothesis. Leverage is negatively and significantly associated with signed discretionary accruals, suggesting that debt-contracting pressure encourages more income-decreasing or less income-increasing accrual choices. Firm size demonstrates the strongest negative association, indicating that political costs represent the most robust PAT mechanism in this sector. Sustainability disclosure significantly moderates the relationships between profitability, leverage, firm size, and signed discretionary accruals. Institutional ownership also moderates the profitability and leverage channels but does not influence the firm-size channel. In contrast, managerial ownership does not significantly moderate any of the tested relationships. Overall, the findings suggest that accounting choice behavior in Indonesian basic and chemical industry firms is better explained by a conditional PAT perspective, where political costs and sustainability disclosure are more influential than bonus-plan incentives, while ownership governance operates selectively through institutional ownership.
References
Alsharairi M, Khamis R, Alkhalaileh M. How does real earnings management affect firms’ future profitability? Evidence from Jordan. Corporate Ownership and Control. 2020;18(1). doi:10.22495/cocv18i1art4
Odoemelam N, Okafor RG, Ofoegbu NG. Effect of international financial reporting standard (IFRS) adoption on earnings value relevance of quoted Nigerian firms. Cogent Business and Management. 2019;6(1). doi:10.1080/23311975.2019.1643520
Cugova A, Cug J. International Financial Reporting Standards as a tool for Earnings management. SHS Web of Conferences. 2021;92. doi:10.1051/shsconf/20219202012
Hong K, Kim J, Kwack SY. External Monitoring, ESG, and Information Content of Discretionary Accruals. Sustainability 2022, Vol 14, Page 7599. 2022 Jun 22;14(13):7599. doi:10.3390/SU14137599
Nguyen CP, Pham NDT. Debt covenant and financial intermediation: how debt characteristics shape earnings management in Vietnam. Journal of Economics and Development. 2025 Nov 26;27(4):293–308. doi:10.1108/JED-05-2025-0198
Ardiansyah M. ACCOUNTING CONSERVATISM IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF POSITIVE ACCOUNTING THEORY: A STUDY OF ISLAMIC BANKING IN INDONESIA. Asian Economic and Financial Review. 2022;12(6). doi:10.55493/5002.v12i6.4500
Khalil M, Simon J. Efficient contracting, earnings smoothing and managerial accounting discretion. Journal of Applied Accounting Research. 2014;15(1). doi:10.1108/JAAR-06-2012-0050
Li Z, Wang L, Wruck K. Accounting-Based Compensation and Debt Contracts*. Contemporary Accounting Research. 2020;37(3). doi:10.1111/1911-3846.12574
Barua A, Kim JH, Yi S. Hierarchy of earnings thresholds based on discretionary accruals. Advances in Accounting. 2019;44. doi:10.1016/j.adiac.2018.12.002
Jamadar Y, Ong TS, Abdullah AA, Kamarudin F. Earnings and discretionary accruals. Managerial and Decision Economics. 2022;43(2). doi:10.1002/mde.3391
Lazzem S, Jilani F. The impact of leverage on accrual-based earnings management: The case of listed French firms. Res Int Bus Finance. 2018;44. doi:10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.103
McNichols MF, Stubben SR. Research Design Issues in Studies Using Discretionary Accruals. Abacus. 2018. doi:10.1111/abac.12128
Belz T, von Hagen D, Steffens C. Taxes and firm size: Political cost or political power? Journal of Accounting Literature. 2019;42. doi:10.1016/j.acclit.2018.12.001
Jung S. Powerful Politicians, Political Costs, and Income Smoothing. Accounting Review. 2024;99(5). doi:10.2308/TAR-2017-0481
Perello-Marin MR, Rodríguez-Rodríguez R, Alfaro-Saiz JJ. Analysing GRI reports for the disclosure of SDG contribution in European car manufacturers. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2022;181. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121744
Barik RL, Mohapatra AK Das. GLOBAL REPORTING INITIATIVE (GRI): STRENGTHENING SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING AND CORPORATE TRANSPARENCY IN INDIA. International Journal of Research in Commerce and Management Studies. 2025;07(04). doi:10.38193/ijrcms.2025.7442
Alonso-Paulí E. Incentives versus monitoring within the firm: Understanding Codes of Corporate Governance. Managerial and Decision Economics. 2022 Apr 1;43(3):813–28. doi:10.1002/mde.3420
Talawa M, Badwan N. Impact of accounting conservatism and corporate governance on stock price breakdown in firms listed on the Palestine Stock Exchange. Asian Journal of Accounting Research. 2024;9(3). doi:10.1108/AJAR-11-2023-0385
Avelé D. Positive accounting theory: theoretical and critical perspectives. International Journal of Critical Accounting. 2014;6(4):396. doi:10.1504/IJCA.2014.067244
Srivastava J, Baag PK. Positive Accounting Theory and Agency Costs: A Critical Perspective. The International Journal of Management. 2020 Jul 15;14(2):101–13. doi:10.26573/2020.14.2.3
Utari C, Manalu MW, Lubis NR, Muda I. Approaches and critiques of Positive Accounting Theory (PAT) and Normative Accounting Theory (NAT) : a literature review. Brazilian Journal of Development. 2023 Dec 23;9(12):31784–99. doi:10.34117/BJDV9N12-082
Zhafir MN, Subroto B. Is Positive accounting theory still relevan? Journal of Applied Business Taxation and Economics Research. 2024 Feb 22;3(3):246–58. doi:10.54408/JABTER.V3I3.256
Shaikh I. ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL, AND GOVERNANCE (ESG) PRACTICE AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: AN INTERNATIONAL EVIDENCE. Journal of Business Economics and Management. 2021;23(1). doi:10.3846/jbem.2022.16202
Kumar P, Firoz M. Does Accounting-based Financial Performance Value Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Disclosures? A detailed note on a corporate sustainability perspective. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal. 2022;16(1). doi:10.14453/aabfj.v16i1.4
Barik RL, Mohapatra AK Das. GLOBAL REPORTING INITIATIVE (GRI): STRENGTHENING SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING AND CORPORATE TRANSPARENCY IN INDIA. International Journal of Research in Commerce and Management Studies. 2025;07(04):556–64. doi:10.38193/IJRCMS.2025.7442
Perello-Marin MR, Rodríguez-Rodríguez R, Alfaro-Saiz JJ. Analysing GRI reports for the disclosure of SDG contribution in European car manufacturers. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2022 Aug 1;181:121744. doi:10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2022.121744
García-Sánchez IM, García-Meca E. Do talented managers invest more efficiently? The moderating role of corporate governance mechanisms. Corporate Governance: An International Review. 2018 Jul 1;26(4):238–54. doi:10.1111/CORG.12233;ISSUE:ISSUE:DOI
Refakar M, Ravaonorohanta N. The effectiveness of governance mechanisms in emerging markets: A review. Corporate Ownership and Control. 2020;17(3):8. doi:10.22495/COCV17I3ART1
Nel G, Jachi M, Scholtz H. The impact of institutional and managerial ownership on the pay-performance relationship: Evidence from JSE-listed firms. Journal of Management and Governance. 2025;29(4). doi:10.1007/s10997-024-09725-9
Peerbhai F, Gumede B, Shabangu N, Gumede N, Ndhlovu N, Hlomela T. The Impact of Ownership Structure on Firms’ Dividend Policy: Evidence from JSE Listed Firms. AUDOE. 2021;17(5).
Rousseau D, Kim BJ, Splenda R, Young S, Lee J, Beck D. Does chief executive compensation predict financial performance or inaccurate financial reporting in listed companies: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews. 2023. doi:10.1002/cl2.1370
Suhardjo S, Renaldo N, Andi A, Sudarno S, Hutahuruk MBr, Suharti S, et al. Bonus Compensation and Real Earnings Management: Audit Committee Effectiveness as Moderation Variable. The Accounting Journal of Binaniaga. 2022;7(1). doi:10.33062/ajb.v7i1.495
Loyola G, Portilla Y. Managerial compensation as a double-edged sword: Optimal incentives under misreporting. International Review of Economics and Finance. 2020;69. doi:10.1016/j.iref.2020.04.007
Chauhan Y, Jaiswall M. Economic policy uncertainty and incentive to smooth earnings. International Review of Economics and Finance. 2023;85. doi:10.1016/j.iref.2023.01.014
Nasution STA, Putri RF, Muda I, Ginting S. Positive Accounting Theory: Theoretical Perspectives on Accounting Policy Choice. In. 2020. doi:10.5220/0009506011281133
Anagnostopoulou SC, Tsekrekos AE. The effect of financial leverage on real and accrual-based earnings management. Accounting and Business Research. 2017;47(2). doi:10.1080/00014788.2016.1204217
Khanh MTH, Thu AP. The effect of financial leverage on real and accrual-based earnings management in vietnamese firms. Economics and Sociology. 2019;12(4). doi:10.14254/2071-789X.2019/12-4/18
Nasution STA, Putri RF, Muda I, Ginting S. Positive Accounting Theory: Theoretical Perspectives on Accounting Policy Choice. In. 2020. doi:10.5220/0009506011281133
Hong K, Kim J, Kwack SY. External Monitoring, ESG, and Information Content of Discretionary Accruals. Sustainability (Switzerland). 2022;14(13). doi:10.3390/su14137599
Sakawa H, Watanabel N. Institutional ownership and firm performance under stakeholder-oriented corporate governance. Sustainability (Switzerland). 2020;12(3). doi:10.3390/su12031021
Nguyen P, Rahman N, Zhao R. Do firms adjust their payout policy to public perception of their social irresponsibility? Journal of Business Research. 2024;185:1–52. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114941
Habib A, Costa MD, Khamis A. Consequences of local social norms : A review of the literature in accounting , finance , and corporate governance. 2023;3–45. doi:10.1111/acfi.13034
Mlawu L, Matenda FR, Sibanda M. Incentives for Accrual-Based Earnings Management in Emerging Economies—A Systematic Literature Review with Bibliometric Analysis. Administrative Sciences. 2025;15(6). doi:10.3390/admsci15060209
Gupta J, Kushwaha NN, Li X, Ebrahimi T. Does firm-level political risk influence earnings management? Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting. 2025;64(3). doi:10.1007/s11156-024-01330-z
Huang Y, Chen L, Hong F. Bank intervention and firms ’ earnings management : evidence from debt covenant violations. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting. 2024;63(1):237–64. doi:10.1007/s11156-024-01255-7
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Denny Putri Hapsari Putri, Denny Kurnia Denny
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
