Case Study: Strength of Child Witness Testimony in Cases of Sexual Abuse in Decision No. IX: 135/Pid.Sus/2023/DPK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61194/law.v2i3.180Keywords:
Child Testimony, Proof, Judge's SubjectivityAbstract
In current criminal justice practice, there have been developments regarding the use of children's testimonies, with some judges in Indonesia admitting children's statements as evidence in cases involving minors, even though we know that children are not sworn in before giving testimony. Therefore, the aim of this study is to analyze the legal strength of children's testimonies as evidence in the criminal justice system, focusing on the case with the District Court Decision Number 135/Pid.Sus/2023/PN. Dpk. This research employs a normative legal research method with a legislative approach, conducted to explore legal issues. The primary data source supporting this research includes the District Court Decision from Depok Number: 282/Pid.Sus/2023/DPK, while secondary data consists of Law Number 35 Year 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 23 Year 2002 concerning Child Protection, Law Number 11 Year 2012 concerning Juvenile Justice System, and Law Number 8 Year 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Code. The findings of this research indicate that the evidentiary strength of children's testimonies as witnesses in the Indonesian criminal justice system depends on the validity of the testimony presented in court. However, the truthfulness and probative value of such testimonies are subject to the judge's subjective assessment, and because the evaluation of witness evidence is generally non-binding, this also applies to child witnesses.
References
Amrizal Siagian, E. S. (2020). Kekuatan Saksi Anak Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Tindak Pidana Persetubuhan Terhadap Anak. Mizan: Journal of Islamic Law, 4(2), 203-214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32507/mizan.v4i2.815
Anwar, S. &. (2022). Kekuatan Alat Bukti Keterangan Saksi Anak Dalam. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Bidang Hukum Pidana, 351-362.
Bakri, S. (2009). Evidence Law in Criminal Trial Practice. Yogyakarta: Total Media.
Darwan Prints,. 1989. Hukum Acara Pidana Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Djambatan.
Eddy O.S Hiariej. 2012. Teori Dan Hukum Pembuktian. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Gadis. Aravia 2005. Potret Buram Eksploitasi Kekerasan Seksual Pada Anak. Jakarta: Ford Foundation.
Fuady, M. (2006). Teori Hukum Pembuktian (Pidana Dan Perdata). Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Gultom, M. (2013). Legal Protection for Children in Indonesia's Criminal Justice System. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Harahap, M. Y. (2012). Pembahasan Permasalahan Dan Penerapan Kuhap Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, dan Peninjauan Kembali. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Harefa, B. (2012). Selected Captions on Legal Protection for Children. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.
Hari Sasangka, L. R. (2003). Hukum Pembuktian dalam Perkara Pidana. Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Indonesia, C. S. (2020, July 28). setkab.go.id. Retrieved from Gov’t Issues Regulation on Rights of Child Victims and Witnesses: https://setkab.go.id/en/govt-issues-regulation-on-rights-of-child-victims-and-witnesses/
I Made Pasek Diantha. 2016. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dalam Justifikasi Teori Hukum. Cetakan Kedua. Jakarta: Kencana.
Kamri Ahmad, D. (2017). Batasan Penerapan Asas Persidangan Terbuka untuk Umum dalam Siaran Persidangan Pidana oleh Media. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 24(3), 488-505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol24.iss3.art8
Loegman, L. (2002). Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana,. Jakarta: Datacom.
Marpuang, L. (2004). Kejahatan Terhadap Kesusilaan dan Masalah Prevensinya. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Mohamad Ismail Bin Mohamad Yunus, N. R. (2021). The Laws Protecting Child Witnesses in Giving Evidence: Harmonization Between Malaysian and As-Sharia. Indonesia Private Law Review, 2(2), 137-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25041/iplr.v2i2.2401
Musyawir Nurtan, S. (2021). Kekuatan Pembuktian Keterangan Saksi Anak Dalam Sistem. Journal of Lex Generalis (JLG), 512 .
Nada Samyra, S. S. (2023). SAKSI KORBAN DIBAWAH UMUR YANG DISUMPAH DALAM KASUS PENCABULAN (PUTUSAN NOMOR 1162/PID.B/2021/PN.BDG. Reformasi Hukum Trisakti, 414 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.25105/refor.v5i2.16011
Pramesti, T. J. (2017, July 28). hukumonline. Retrieved from Pemeriksaan Saksi di Tingkat Penyidikan dan di Pengadilan: https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/pemeriksaan-saksi-di-tingkat-penyidikan-dan-di-pengadilan-lt4ca459db4ecc2/
Koesno, R.A.1994. Susunan Pidana Dalam Negara Sosial Indonesia. Bandung: Sumur
Laden Marpuang. 2004. Kejahatan Terhadap Kesusilaan dan Masalah Prevensinya. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
M. Yahya Harahap. 2006. Pembahasan Permasalahan Dan Penerapan Kuhap Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, Dan Peninjauan Kembali: Edisi Kedua. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Muhammad Taufiq Makarao. 2014. Weny Bukamo, Syaiful Azri. Hukum Perlindungan Anak dan Penghapusan Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Pratama, D. F. (2023). The Impact of the Power of Proof of Stand-alone Testimony Against Decisions on Criminal Cases. IBLAM School of Law, 1(01).
Prodjodikoro, W. (2002). Tindak-Tindak Pidana Tertentu Di Indonesia. Jakarta: PT. Refika Aditama.
Prodjohamidjojo, M. (1994). Kitab Undang Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (Commentary on Criminal Procedure Code). Jakarta: Bulan Bintang.
Sunggono, B. (2009). Legal Research Methodology. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Umpel, N. S. (2015). Kajian Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pedofilia Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 Tentang Perlindungan Anak. Lex Crimen, 4(3), 136-142.
Vienna. (2015). Training Programme on the Treatment of Child Victims and Child Witnesses of Crime for Prosecutors and Judges. New York: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) and United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF).
Yenni Maya Sari, A. S. (2022). Legal Protection of Children as Witnesses in Criminal Cases (Study at the Belawan District Attorney). International Journal Reglement & Society, 3(3), 226-237. Johnny Ibrahim. 2008. Teori dan Motodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayu Media Publishing.
Depok District Court Decision, Number: 135/Pid.Sus./2023/PN Dpk, May 26, 2023.
Criminal Code
Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Justice System states
Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP)
