Integration of Cognitive, Affective, and Psychomotor Domain Scoring in Islamic Religious Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61194/education.v1i2.106Keywords:
Scoring, Cognitive Domain, Affective Domain, Psychomotor Domain, Islamic Religious EducationAbstract
An educator must consider the levels in each domain (cognitive, affective and psychomotor) when compiling scores and weighting questions. This is also the case in Islamic Religious Education lessons. The purpose of writing this article is to explain the integration of scoring for cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains along with examples in Islamic religious education questions. Using literature studies, there are conclusions obtained from this article, namely the benefits for students, 1). Helps students to develop balanced competencies. 2). Helps students to understand the relationship between knowledge, attitudes, and skills. 3). Helps students to become a whole person with integrity. So it is highly recommended for educators to be able to carry out the right application, with the integration of cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domain scoring in order to become one of the important instruments to improve the quality of Islamic religious education in the world of education.
References
Abd Rahman, M. M., Kaami, M., Mohamad, M. A. H., Omar, M. H. M., Nor, M. H. M., & Abd Aziz, A. R. (2014). Rekabentuk Model Sistem Guna Semula Air Wudhuk. Journal of Techno-Social, 6(1).
Affandi, L., Rahmat, M., & Supriadi, U. (2021). A THEMATIC DIGITAL QURAN LEARNING MODEL IN ISLAMIC RELIGIOUS EDUCATION. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 7(2), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpi.v7i2.15062
Amaly, A. M., Herdiana, Y., Ruswandi, U., & Arifin, B. S. (2023). THE NECESSITY AND REALITY OF ISLAMIC RELIGIOUS EDUCATION IN SCHOOLS. Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura, 23(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.22373/jiif.v23i1.13190
Anggor, M. T. (2008). Metode penelitian. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.
Asrul, A., Saragih, A. H., & Mukhtar, M. (2022). Evaluasi pembelajaran.
Elis Ratna Wulan, E., & Rusdiana, A. (2015). Evaluasi pembelajaran. Pustaka Setia.
Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115.
Fadli, M. R. (2021). Memahami desain metode penelitian kualitatif. Humanika, Kajian Ilmiah Mata Kuliah Umum, 21(1), 33–54.
Hamid, A. (2020). RADICALISM PREVENTION THROUGH ISLAMIC RELIGIOUS EDUCATION LEARNING AT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 6(1), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.15575/jpi.v6i1.8352
Hikamudin, E., & Hairun, Y. (2021). Analisis Disparitas Skor Tampak dan Estimasi Skor Murni dengan Pengkategorian Acuan Normatif pada Tes Hasil Belajar Siswa. Delta-Pi: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 10(1).
Ivalyn, N., & Rahadi, A. P. (2020). Pembelajaran Dalam Jaringan Dengan Pendekatan Saintifik Berbantuan Platform Edmodo Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa SMA. Algoritma: Journal of Mathematics Education, 2(2), 100–115.
Jamin, H. (2018). Upaya meningkatkan kompetensi profesional guru. At-Ta’dib: Jurnal Ilmiah Prodi Pendidikan Agama Islam, 19–36.
Jaya, I., & Ardat, A. (2013). Penerapan statistik untuk pendidikan.
Kitamura, H. (2022). The historical contingency of religious normativity Local practices in Malaysian Islamic banking. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 12(2), 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1086/720511
Kumaidi, K. (2016). Interpretasi Koefisien Korelasi Skor-Butir dengan Skor Total Uji Kebermaknaan Koefisien Reliabilitas KR-20 dalam Penelitian Pendidikan dan Psikologi. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 11(2).
Mardapi, D. (2010). Komparasi ketepatan estimasi koefisien reliabilitas teori skor murni klasik. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 14(1).
Nur, H. M., & Fatonah, N. (2022). Paradigma kompetensi guru. Jurnal PGSD Uniga, 1(1), 12–16.
Purnama, S., Aziz, H., Faza, A. B., Bastian, M., & Syafii, A. (2022). The Shift in the Authority of Islamic Religious Education: A Qualitative Content Analysis on Online Religious Teaching. Qualitative Report, 27(9), 1830–1846. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5325
Ramdhan, M. (2021). Metode penelitian. Cipta Media Nusantara.
Rofieq, A. (2008). Teknik Pemberian Skor dan Nilai Hasil Tes. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Rohman, H. (2020). Pengaruh kompetensi guru terhadap kinerja guru. JURNAL MADINASIKA Manajemen Pendidikan Dan Keguruan, 1(2), 92–102.
Sudijono, A. (2001). Pengantar evaluasi pendidikan.
Sukiman, S. (2012). Pengembangan sistem evaluasi. Insan Madani.
Sumardi, M. (2020). Teknik pengukuran dan penilaian hasil belajar. Deepublish.
Susilawati, S., Chakim, A., Hambali, M., Islamy, M. I., & Rahmaniah, A. (2021). The Urgency of Digital Literacy for Generation Z in Improving Learning of Islamic Religious Education. Library Philosophy and Practice, 2021, 1–16. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85104721409&partnerID=40&md5=e46660c188ea395bec0aeae6fa4fb664
Sutami, E. (n.d.). Hubungan Antara Penilaian Kinerja dan Hasil Belajar pad Konsep Cahaya dengan Menggunakan Metode Eksperimen.
Syafi’i, A., Akmal, & Bulan, S. (2023). Understanding and Practice of Teachers in Carrying out Assessment of Islamic Religious Education Subjects at MTs As’. Adiyah Uloe.Educational Scientific Work Forum, 7(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/https://journal.unsika.ac.id/index.php/pendidikan/article/view/8923
Whyte, S. A. (2022). Islamic Religious Authority in Cyberspace: A Qualitative Study of Muslim Religious Actors in Australia. Religions, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13010069
Winarji, B. (2016). Pendidikan dan pelatihan teknis kegiatan belajar mengajar bagi pamong belajar: modul 05-penilaian hasil belajar.
