Peer Review Process

Peer Review Process

The Sinergi International Journal of Education employs a rigorous evaluation process for all manuscript submissions to ensure high academic standards and originality in educational research. Our review system utilizes a double-blind approach, maintaining anonymity between authors and reviewers throughout the assessment.

Our editorial team comprises education experts from diverse global backgrounds, offering a rich tapestry of perspectives. This international composition enhances the depth and breadth of manuscript evaluations, leading to well-informed editorial decisions in educational scholarship.

The review process unfolds as follows:

  1. Preliminary Manuscript Assessment: The Editor-in-Chief will screen a submitted manuscript to ensure its conformity to the Sinergi International Journal of Education scope and basic submission requirements. The Editor-in-chief will assign an editor based on the articles’ scientific field.
  2. Comprehensive Peer Evaluation: Manuscripts passing the initial screening are assigned to a handling editor, who then:
    • Selects a minimum of two experts in the relevant area of education
    • Orchestrates a double-blind peer review process
    • Ensures a thorough and impartial assessment of the educational research
  3. Decision Based on Collective Expert Input: The journal requires at least two expert reviews before proceeding with any decision. If reviews show significant discrepancies, the handling editor may:
    • Engage a third reviewer for additional insights
    • Seek further clarification from existing reviewers

At this juncture, several outcomes are possible:

  • Manuscript rejection
  • Request for minor revisions
  • Request for major revisions
  • Acceptance without changes
  • Recommendation for resubmission (if substantial content or language modifications are necessary)

Accepted manuscripts are returned to authors for formatting refinements. The Editor-in-Chief makes the final acceptance decision, considering:

  • Recommendations from the handling editor
  • Approval from the editorial board
  • Overall contribution to educational theory, research, or practice
  1. Internal Revision and Reassessment: Authors of manuscripts requiring revisions are given a three-week window to modify and reformat their work. Subsequently, the handling editor:
    • Reassesses the revised manuscript
    • Determines if changes adequately address reviewers' comments and suggestions
    • May initiate additional revision cycles if necessary
  2. Final Publication Verdict: In this concluding stage, the revised manuscript faces a binary outcome: acceptance or rejection. The decision hinges on:
    • The handling editor's assessment of improvements made
    • Alignment with the Sinergi International Journal of Education's quality benchmarks
    • Potential impact on educational theory, policy, or practice

Manuscripts failing to incorporate necessary changes or falling short of the journal's rigorous standards will be rejected.

This multi-tiered review process ensures that the Sinergi International Journal of Education publishes only high-quality, original research, maintaining its position as a respected source in the field of education. By combining expert knowledge, diverse perspectives, and rigorous evaluation, we strive to advance the understanding and practice of education on a global scale.

Our commitment to publishing excellence extends beyond the review process. We continuously refine our procedures to stay at the forefront of academic publishing in education, ensuring that our journal remains a valuable resource for researchers, practitioners, policymakers, and educators in the dynamic and evolving field of educational science.