Commanding with Politeness: English Lecturers' Directives at Institut Prima Bangsa
Keywords:
Politeness Strategy, Directive speech acts, Classroom interaction, Positive politeness, Lecturer’s speech actsAbstract
In the context of communication, the role of politeness in fostering positive interaction between interlocutors and their conversation partners cannot be overstated. This research addresses the existing gap in understanding of politeness strategies across different regions in Indonesia, with a particular focus on the strategies employed by an English lecturer at Institut Prima Bangsa Cirebon. The objective of this study is to identify the positive politeness strategies employed by the lecturer through a qualitative, phenomenological approach with data collected through observation. The findings indicate that the lecturer predominantly utilises directive speech acts, including commands, requests, and suggestions, during classroom interactions. The results identify seven key positive politeness strategies in the lecturer's directive speech acts, as follows: (1) Using Affectionate Greetings, (2) Involving Interlocutors and Hearers in activities, (3) Employing Subtle Request Markers, (4) Incorporating Humor, (5) Including Elements of Praise, (6) Considering the Wishes of the Speech Partner, and (7) Seeking Agreement These strategies are not only essential for the maintenance of a respectful and inclusive learning environment but also for enhanced student engagement. By employing these politeness techniques, the lecturer ensures that students feel valued and motivated to participate without feeling pressured or uncomfortable. This study contributes to the broader understanding of the function of politeness in the context of language learning and teaching, with particular reference to the diverse cultural landscape of Indonesia.References
Basra, S., & Thoyyibah, L. (2017). A speech act analysis of teacher talk in an EFL classroom. International Journal of Education, 10(1), 73–81.
Bolton, E., & Emery, R. (2021). Using educational technology to support students’ real world learning. Applied Pedagogies for Higher Education: Real World Learning and Innovation across the Curriculum, 343–369.
Bonvillain, N. (2019). Language, culture, and communication: The meaning of messages. Rowman & Littlefield.
Brown, P. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage (Vol. 4). Cambridge University Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
Culpeper, J., & Hardaker, C. (2017). Impoliteness. The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im) Politeness, 199–225.
Economidou-Kogetsidis, M. (2016). Variation in evaluations of the (im)politeness of emails from L2 learners and perceptions of the personality of their senders. Journal of Pragmatics, 106, 1–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2016.10.001
Fathi, S. (2024). Revisiting Brown and Levinson’s Theory of Politeness. European Journal of Language and Culture Studies, 3(5), 1–11.
Gotzner, N., & Mazzarella, D. (2021). Face management and negative strengthening: The role of power relations, social distance, and gender—frontiers in Psychology, 12, 602977.
Gunaningtyas, M. T., & Fitriati, S. W. (2021). The Use of Brown-Levinsonâ€TM s Politeness Strategies As A Realization of Sociocultural Competence Among Adult Learners of Elti Surakarta. English Education Journal, 11(2), 219–227.
Hoidn, S., & Reusser, K. (2020). Foundations of student-centered learning and teaching. In The Routledge international handbook of student-centered learning and teaching in higher education (pp. 17–46). Routledge.
Hosni, H. R. (2020). Advice giving in Egyptian Arabic and American English: A cross-linguistic, cross-cultural study. Journal of Pragmatics, 155, 193–212.
Jucker, T., Caspersen, J., Chave, J., Antin, C., Barbier, N., Bongers, F., Dalponte, M., van Ewijk, K. Y., Forrester, D. I., & Haeni, M. (2017). Allometric equations for integrating remote sensing imagery into forest monitoring programmes. Global Change Biology, 23(1), 177–190.
Kochem, T., Ghosh, M. G., Compton, L., & Cotos, E. (2020). Oral Communication for Non-Native Speakers of English. Iowa State University.
Krisdiah, H. Y., Prayitno, H. J., Huda, M., & Rahmawati, L. E. (2022). Teacher’s Directive Speech Acts on the Online Teaching and Learning Process of Kampus Mengajar Program. International Conference of Learning on Advance Education (ICOLAE 2021), 165–179.
Leech, G. N. (2016). Principles of pragmatics. Routledge.
Mahmud, M., & Sahril, S. (2019). Women’s Language in the Communicative Styles of Female Lecturers in Indonesian University Context. The Asian EFL Journal, 26(6.2), 247–269.
Maxwell, J. A. (2008). Designing a qualitative study (Vol. 2). The SAGE handbook of applied social research methods.
Milner, H. R. (2021). Start where you are, but don’t stay there: Understanding diversity, opportunity gaps, and teaching in today’s classrooms. Harvard Education Press.
Mishra, K., Firdaus, M., & Ekbal, A. (2022). Please be polite: Towards building a politeness adaptive dialogue system for goal-oriented conversations. Neurocomputing, 494, 242–254. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2022.04.029
Mujiyanto, J., & Yuliasri, I. (2022). Interlocutors’ Responses to The Realization of Positive Politeness Strategies in Classroom Discussion Through Online Media. English Education Journal, 12(3), 322–332.
Pavel, D., & Maria, F. (2022). Perception of Prosodic and Aspectual Cues to Politeness in Teacher Directives in L1 and L2 Russian. Journal of Language and Education, 8(1 (29)), 23–37.
Pomerantz, A., Winchester, J., de Arellano, M. R., Heidari-Shahreza, M. A., Gardner, S., Pimenova, N., Hodson, R., & Petkova, M. (2020). Bridging the humor barrier: Humor competency training in English language teaching. Rowman & Littlefield.
Pratama, H. (2019). Linguistic politeness in online communication. pemimpinmuda. id.
Prayitno, H. J., Markhamah, Nasucha, Y., Huda, M., Ratih, K., Ubaidullah, Rohmadi, M., Boeriswati, E., & Thambu, N. (2022). Prophetic educational values in the Indonesian language textbook: pillars of positive politeness and character education. Heliyon, 8(8), e10016. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10016
Rahayuningsih, D., Saleh, M., & Fitriati, S. W. (2020). The realization of politeness strategies in EFL teacher-students classroom interaction. English Education Journal, 10(1), 85–93.
Saputra, N., Lubis, T., & Setiawan, F. (2021). Politeness strategies for the speech acts of Indonesian language education students in pidie regency. Tradition and Modernity of Humanity, 1(1), 33–40.
Shengnan, L., & Hallinger, P. (2021). Unpacking the effects of culture on school leadership and teacher learning in China. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(2), 214–233.
Sudarmawan, I. P. Y., Juliari, I. G. A. I. T., & Yuniari, N. M. (2022). an An Analysis Of Speech Act And Politeness Strategy Used By English Lecturer of Dwijendra University in Online Classroom Interaction. Yavana Bhasha: Journal of English Language Education, 5(2), 176–185.
Sung, L., Ndhlovu, F., Chan, E., Esler, J., & Li, H. (2022). Teaching and Learning Linguistic Politeness in Australian Higher Education: Chinese as an Additional Language.
Trinity, O. E., Udoh, C., & Chukwu, E. (2024). Influence of Politeness Strategies in Classroom Discourse in Delta State University, Abraka, Nigeria. NIGERIAN JOURNAL OF ARTS AND HUMANITIES (NJAH), 4(3).
Wasanadiputra, M. I., Sabardila, A., & Wahyudi, A. B. (2022). Politeness of Directive Speech Acts in Learning at SMA N 1 Ngawen to Improve Leadership Character Talents. International Conference of Learning on Advance Education (ICOLAE 2021), 563–570.
